In a story published in the Manchester Evening news, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor instructs everyone…
"Love thy atheist neighbor"
Well thank you father for being so… Christian???
I had a discussion not too long ago with a friend who commented; “look what good work all the Christians are doing, building play grounds for kids, helping the homeless, giving to shelters…” The big issue I have always had with putting a label on kindness is just that, you are putting your label on something that doesn’t require a label.
We all have good intentions, thoughts and desires. We all have some really ugly ones too. The difference is that some humans listen to one side and some to the other. The theist is always quick to point out that this is simply their God or their Satan. I maintain it is even more simple than that. It is simply human nature. There really are good people and bad people. Sometime circumstances drive the nature; sometimes the human overcomes the circumstances. The bottom line is, you are either good at heart or you are not. (I believe most people are, but a bit misguided)
People who build playgrounds and give generously of their time are generally doing it because they are good people. They don’t need a label to show why they are good. I know many atheists who are much more generous than I and they do all the things you would associate with a kind hearted person. The difference is the Christians have good PR people. They gather all their friends together (I suspect a few atheists are in there as well) and then tell everyone to “smile for the picture”. Now to be perfectly fair...it should be pointed out that Atheist are quick to point out how they too are helpful. Atheist Volunteers
So what happens if you take away the label? In the perfect world; when there are no religions, what would all the children be left to play in the dirt? Would the homeless be left to fend for themselves? The obvious answer is “NO”. All of the same kind hearted people would do the same things they are doing now.
In a discussion between and atheist and a theist I heard the atheist ask “if you have irrefutable evidence today that god absolutely did not exist, would you start rapping, pillaging and killing.” The theist answered “Well sure, why not?” So for this person his religion was the only thing making him a “good person”. At the conclusion of the conversation the atheist told the theist, “I hope you stay in church for the rest of your life!” I agree. Not only was the theist psychotic but obviously an idiot.
Bottom line…
Be kind to everyone PERIOD! Because you are the guardian of your kind heart and you don’t have to be a god, or worship one, to offer a helping hand.
5 comments:
It seems so obvious, and yet the "without religion, there is no morality" argument is one trotted out with tedious regularity. The refutation I've always relied on is to point out that Christians tend only to follow the bits of the Bible's moral code that fit with the ethical precepts of their society. So "love thy neighbour" is fine and dandy, but "stone adulterers to death" is generally sidelined. The question then becomes, what criteria enable them to choose the appropriate verses to cherry-pick? And the answer? Their own sense of morality!
Shameless plug: I took apart Cormac Murphy-O'Connor's speech at my own blog, you might want to look over whether he is in fact saying "be nice to atheists" at all...
You kind of hinted at this, but the atheist who will not be rewarded in the end with salvation or an afterlife is the most sincere of those who do good. An atheist does good simply to do goo whereas some religious do good because they have to. Good post. Thanks.
I am not really sure what i think about this post. It was an interesting read and so are the comments. But if atheists' whole perspective in life is to just do good onto others even though nothing good will happen to you in the after life, then what is the point. If i look at it that way then all i think is, "What is the point?" If nothing is going to happen to me after i die then life is a waste. In fact i would come to the conclusion that there is no reason for life to exist.
Then i wonder, "If there is no god, and we are here because of evolution or something like that, then why do we even want to know why we are here and no other species does?"
Well Jeff, the answers to your questions lay in philosophy. Not Theology. I suggest some reading in that department.
Peace
TK
I believe, and it's always disheartening to hear "atheists can't be moral" arguments, or "Christians are so moral" arguments. I liked this post, and this comment on another blog came to mind:
"An atheist who treats others as he would like to be treated is much better off than one claiming to be a Christian who doesn’t. While many Christians teach that Christians will be forgiven for all their sins and argue that others will not be forgiven – Jesus instead gave a parable that those who knew what they should be doing will in the end be judged much more sharply than those who didn’t know. So, if a Christian hears in church or reads in his Bible that he should be doing good to others and believes it to be the will or word of God and then doesn’t do it – and an atheist with no compulsion, no conscious hope of any reward does the good instead – the atheist is far better off than the Christian."
Post a Comment